you say you want a revolution....
I've been to 2 absolutely fascinating communist gatherings in the past week. One was a presentation by 2 Cuban youth activists about Cuba and the US blockade, and the other was by 3 UK activists about their recent tour of the DPR Korea. I must admit I actually find it amazing that there are still revolutionaries in this country, considering that the late 80s saw the very public failure of most of the world's Communist regimes, but of course they have explanations for all that, and of course they are eager to paint as rosy a picture as possible of the remaining Communist countries in the world. How far I believe them is quite different for the two countries.
Cuba
I have a fairly high opinion of Cuba, in that I know several people who have been there themselves, and there do seem to be many good things to say about the country. It's not wealthy, but considering that the huge market on its doorstep is closed off by the
absurd US blockade it's done pretty well, and more striking than that is the high standard of living in relation its poverty. On objective indicators like adult literacy and life expectancy (which I have always felt are far better measures of quality of life than GNP) Cuba is not that far behind the UK, in spite of the fact that its economic indicators are close to the other Caribbean countries (where life expectancies are barely over 50).
We were treated to an interesting talk about the place by 2 Cubans, which felt much more like "hey look at how proud I am of my lovely homeland" than any political indoctrination. Then there was a question and answer session, which was actually quite irritating, but I'll come back to that later. One of my friends asked what the Cuban's had to say about Amnesty's criticisms of Cuba over the
imprisonment of dissidents, and the answers were not really very satisfying - US attempts to undermine Cuba were used as justification. If it wasn't acceptable for McCarthy to lock up commies (and I can think of few bleaker periods in US history) then it also isn't acceptable for Castro to lock up non-commies. The same standard must apply....
All in all I was left with a slight reinforcement of the positive image I already had of Cuba, but still some nagging questions. I'm 100% convinced Cubans are better off because of the overthrow of Batista and the failure of the Bay of Pigs invasion, but would they have been even better off with a more open system of government? Freedom of speech seems to be regarded as a worthwhile thing to sacrifice in exchange for the achievements of the revolution, but is it really, considering that free speech and open government are the only long term restrictions on government excesses? What's going to happen when Castro dies - will someone emerge to be a Stalin to his Lenin, will the country gradually open up like China, or will his successor be a carbon copy like the two Kims in the DPRK? If Cuba is so great and that really is the whole picture, why do so many Cubans risk so much trying to get to Florida?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea
The DPRK is quite another matter. I have as yet to meet anybody from there, and the only people I know who have been there are themselves Marxists, so don't exactly amount to unbiased sources. I also don't know much about the place - these next couple of paragraphs will distil most of my knowledge, which you will probably agree is not very impressive. The impression I do have is that life is much harder for a North Korean than for a Cuban, and was that way even before the series of natural disasters in the late 90s that caused the dramatic
food shortage.
The presentation was by a motley crew of local communists (up until 6 months ago I had never met anyone who would actually call themselves a communist) who had recently been to North Korea on a delegation. This of course means that they were hardly the most unbiased of observers, they couldn't really have that much of an idea of how living in the country feels (it's pretty clear from my own travels that a week in a country gives one some sort of flavour, but a limited one), and they would have been shown what their hosts (the government) wanted them to see.
They had some pretty good things to report, particularly about the DPRK's attitude to education - the central library (
Grand People's Study House - picture below) Pyongyang which amounts to a far more genuinely open University than anything I've seen or heard about elsewhere. As well as a vast collection of books (including lots of books
donated by overseas residents) and reading rooms, as any national library would have, there are open lectures, video-taped and TV broadcast lectures, and
'question-and-answer rooms' where authorities on particular subjects sit and wait for any individual to walk in and ask a question about anything, which they then have to do their best to answer.
In general Pyongyang sounds (and
looks) like a good place (I don't want to say anything stronger than that on the basis of a few photos and a few highly biased opinions), but it was pretty clear that the delegation had not been anywhere else in Korea. At the risk of being over-cynical, that does sound awfully like they were just allowed to see the showpiece capital, and how shall I put this? If I were to show a Korean the City of London and nowhere else they'd have a pretty distorted image of the UK.....
Communists in the 21st Century
What I actually found most interesting about both events were the people there. For starters there weren't many. I can't say I mourn the lack of interest in an ideal that has been tried and tested in living memory and found seriously lacking, but I do think it's a shame that people show so little interest in politics in general and in other countries' ways of life and ideas. After all, I wasn't there to hear things I agree with, I was there to educate myself about how a group of other people see the world.
I asked a question at the North Korea meeting (I wanted a simple clarification about the status of Korea between WW2 and the Korean War, just in terms of whether it was one country or two, but got a long lecture about how terrible life was at that time), and the chair pointed out (actually quite irrelevantly to the question, but just because he knows I don't share his beliefs) that he tends to assume the audience at such things consists entirely of Marxist-Leninists and sometimes he's wrong. Obviously he's not wrong that often, or he'd stop making the assumption....
This leads me on to my final observation, which is that people go to such things expecting to preach to the converted. Quite apart from being pointless, this lets people slip into really uselessly poor debating habits. The example that struck me most was when my friend asked about Amnesty's criticisms of Cuba. The Cuban delegate tried to answer his question, and while I wasn't very impressed with the answer I appreciated that the question had been addressed, and to some extent the disagreement was a clash of values. After that, the next half hour or so (until the chair finally banned further comments about Amnesty because they were such a dead end) was taken up by audience member after audience member (in spite of the small numbers - just about everyone felt they had to weigh in on this) criticising Amnesty, and targetting the criticisms quite personally at my friend. Not only were many of the criticisms plain wrong (they were very fond of using Amnesty's alleged refusal to criticise the US as 'proof' of Amnesty's non-neutrality, conveniently ignoring the fact that Amnesty frequently and vitriolically criticise the US), but more importantly they were completely irrelevant to the original point. Having been impressed by the presentation I was seriously fed up with the audience by the time the event finally wound up (I didn't want to walk out because it was as anthropologically interesting as it was irritating)....
I have loads more to say on these subjects, but I'm not convinced anyone else will even be interested in what I've written so far, this is possibly my longest post ever, and I'm losing patience with my computer, which crashed halfway through writing this, so I'll sign off now
am I going to
Bristol or am I not? It's a little complicated now, because the project I should have been working on has been cancelled. I have to go back there on Friday to meet various people and see which of 2 possible alternatives appeals more. I think that I will get whichever I prefer out of these 2 (one of which definitely is interesting; I'm less sure about the other), but it's just a bit disappointing when I was
sure I was going and now there is some uncertainty.